Best Cinematography
(Updated: 3/5/10, 12:46p - Added Wes' info) Our Post-ASC predictions are now ready to be revealed as we continue our look at the categories for the 82nd Annual Academy Awards. Here are five facts on the Cinematography award, our predictions and our favorites.
Trivia: Five Facts
- Among the first categories ever created, Cinematography has been going strong for 81 years. The category was split between black-and-white and color work from 1939 through 1956 and again from 1958 to 1966.
- Schindler's List was the first black-and-white film since the category dissolved in 1966 to win the Oscar, nearly 30 years later. Since 1993 when it won, no other film has managed the feat (only two films have been nominated since: The Man Who Wasn't There and Good Night, and Good Luck.)
- Since its inception, 123 statuettes have been given for Cinematography.
- Charles B. Lang Jr and Leon Shamroy are tied for the most nominations in Academy history with 18 each. Behind them is Robert L. Surtees with 16, Harry Stradling Sr with 14 and George Folsey with 13. The most wins is shared between Leon Shamroy and Joseph Ruttenberg with 4 each. Conrad L. Hall, Winton C. Hoch, Arthur Miller, Vittorio Storaro, Robert L. Surtees and Freddie Young are behind them with three each.
- Geoffrey Unsworth and Conrad L. Hall are the only two cinematographers to win the award posthumously in 1980 for Tess and 2002 for Road to Perdition respectively. Allen M. Davey, Joseph August, William C. Mellor and Harry Stradling Sr. were the only previous posthumous nominees.
Predictions
- Avatar (Tripp) (Wes)
- Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince
- The Hurt Locker (Wesley, Peter) (Tripp)
- Inglourious Basterds (Wes)
- The White Ribbon (Wesley, Peter)
KEY: (Winner Prediction) (Alternate Winner)
The Commentary
Wesley Lovell - I'm quite torn on this category. The White Ribbon win at the ASC throws a bit of a monkey wrench into the matter. Not only is black-and-white work not very well favored since the category was done away with in the '60s, but the fact that this is a foreign language film suggests an even larger struggle. But, if the Academy decides it wants to avoid the war between Avatar and Hurt Locker and they don't feel Inglourious Basterds deserving enough, the sheer paucity of concensus may propel it to victory. But, for me, The Hurt Locker seems a lot more likely to win the award simply for being a Best Picture nominee, though this one is one of the few toss ups still out there.
Tripp Burton - Unlike the ASC award, this will be voted on not just by cinematographers but all branches of the Academy. Therefore, the sweeping effects and lighting of Avatar should sway enough voters over the hand-held grittiness of The Hurt Locker. This could be a key match-up between the two films, though, and a win by The Hurt Locker could give it a lot of momentum.
Our Favorite Winners
KEY:
Appears on Two Lists
Appears on Three Lists
Appears on Four Lists
Appears on Opposing Lists
Wesley Lovell
- Sunrise (One of the most gorgeous films ever made, nearly everything about it is perfect. It looks better than a vast majority of films shot today.)
- The Aviator (The Cinematography is one of my favorite aspects of the film. It evokes the many eras of film history through the use of lightning and effects in common use at the time. The golf course scene is one of my favorites.)
- Rebecca (Large, gorgeous exteriors are far too common winners in this category. Rebecca's mostly interior work is a prime example of what cinematography can do.)
- The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring (One of the few examples of an award being given out for shot composition, the hobbits had to be filmed at different angles to their taller compatriots, allowing for use of focus depth and lighting effects to create an environment.)
- Lawrence of Arabia (While I favor the interior shots of most films, Lawrence of Arabia shows what can be done well with exteriors.)
Peter J. Patrick
- Sunrise (the first and still one of the best - the search over the lake at night remains one of the most exquisitely lit sequences ever filmed.)
- The Third Man (breathtaking swirling camera movements.)
- The Bridge on the River Kwai (expansive scenes with detail that never gets lost.)
- Romeo & Juliet (gorgeous cinematography throughout, particularly during the sword fight and dance sequences.)
- Cabaret (marvelous capture of the many aspects of this musical drama.)
Tripp Burton
- Lawrence of Arabia (The desert images, the shadow lighting and the glorious colors add up perfectly, then add in all the iconic compositions and you have this category's greatest winner)
- Sunrise (Perhaps the most perfectly composed film of all time)
- Days of Heaven (The gorgeous images of this film make it a true cinematic work of art)
- Bound for Glory (Set aside the technical achievements and still have a worthy winner. Add in those innovations and you have a wonderful winner)
- JFK (There are so many great winners in this category, but the myriad of looks created for this film push it over the top for me)
Wes Huizar
- Lawrence of Arabia
- Apocalypse Now
- Black Narcissus
- Doctor Zhivago
- Gone With the Wind
Our Least Favorite Winners
KEY:
Appears on Two Lists
Appears on Three Lists
Appears on Four Lists
Appears on Opposing Lists
Wesley Lovell
- Slumdog Millionaire (The use of colors is sometimes garish, the shot selections are all over the place. The film feels cheap at times, which it shouldn't.)
- How Green Was My Valley (There just doesn't seem anything special about this film in terms of Cinematography.)
- Braveheart (The look of the film is a bit washed out and tacky. There are no interesting shots compositions.)
- Dances With Wolves (This is the kind of film that wins Cinematography because of its vast exterior locations, not because of any competence.)
- From Here to Eternity (Nothing terribly memorable here.)
Peter J. Patrick
- Braveheart (confusing war scenes.)
- Dances With Wolves (pretty but that's about it.)
- Legends of the Fall (dull.)
- Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid (see Dances With Wolves.)
- The Rose Tattoo (nothing special.)
Tripp Burton
- The Towering Inferno (An ugly looking film with no life to its look)
- Gandhi (Not a bad winner, just a bland winner)
- Braveheart (Again, cinematography is a strength in the film, but is done in a very boring style)
- Dances With Wolves (Like Gandhi, the camera work is more than serviceable, but brings little life to the film)
- Slumdog Millionaire (Not bad, not good)
Wes Huizar
I don't have an opinion.






March 5th, 2010 - 05:36
I love Caleb Deschanel´s work in The Patriot. It´s like painting brought to life….so beautiful.
March 3rd, 2010 - 12:02
That’s the thing, though. I found The Prestige to be overly showboaty. Wanting to be more than it was supposed to be. Children of Men may have great shot composition, but it’s also a very darkly-shot film.
And I don’t think there’s anything wrong with the starkness of the forest, drained of color. I’ve been in a number of forests that look just like that, so it feels honest, helps keep the film grounded in reality and to contrast sharply with what the young girl envisions in her fantasies.
March 3rd, 2010 - 10:46
To Hollywood Z
I’m glad you feel that way about the cinematography of the english patient.
And to Wesley Lovell
I’f you want dark and memorable images watch The Prestige, If you want framing and shot composition watch Children of Men. I like Pan’s Labyrinth and some scenes like the Pale Man are amazing but honestly the forest scenes in daylight are not great looking. It’s a nice work but flawed. Nevertheless I’m very excited about Guillermo del Toro directing The Hobbit.
Can’t wait to comment on the remaining categories guys
March 3rd, 2010 - 07:23
Absolutely not. While I would have voted for Fargo’s cinematography, there is no denying that the cinematography of The English Patient is arguably the best thing about the movie and rightfully so. The rich colors, the windswept look, in every way, this was a great looking movie.
March 2nd, 2010 - 23:10
I’ll disagree on Pan’s Labyrinth. I love that the film looks so dark. While I don’t begrudge Children of Men any awards, Pan’s is still a great choice. And Cinematography isn’t just about lighting. It’s about shot composition and framing as well, which often gets lost in most discussions.
March 2nd, 2010 - 22:12
YES my favorite cathegory, along with best director, screenplay and editing.
I totally loved the cinematography from harry potter and the half blood prince. I’m so PROUD the oscars recognise the amazing work of Bruno Delbonnel.
This year’s got great cinematography, the white ribbon IS THE best for me and I’m going predict it’s going to win the award.
Oscars should not be about movies sweeping the whole awards but giving it to the ones that deserved it (like Titanic or Return of the King) .
My favorite cinematography winners of all time are:
- Memoirs of a Geisha (A movie with many problems but it’s cinematography is one the perfect things it’s got)
- The Aviator (A tribute to classic cinematography images)
- The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring (It’s not the great sets and costumes and sound that make this cinematograhpy stand out, it’s how great the shots and enviroment is presented. Thank you Peter Jackson, Thank you)
- American Beauty (The red is the color to watch in this film)
- The English Patient (Is Mr. Hollywood Z going to critized the cinematography as well?)
- Schindler’s List
- JFK (A movie in which the narration depends on how the camera shows you the images)
- The Last Emperor (I know, I have a thing for beautiful and epic films, I just think that’s the way films are supposed to be, and a perfect example is The Last Emperor, filled with beautiful images)
- Apocalypse Now (A journey so nightmarish that even the cinematography seems to feel the horror as the films goes on. It’s a work of art)
- Barry Lyndon (A revolution in camerawork, every light is natural, Kubrick was a god)
- Cries and Whispers (I almost mention Fanny and Alexander but the best of images created by the great ingmar bergman is Cries and Whispers)
- Lawrence of Arabia (Of course)
- The Third Man (I’ve never loved the film like others, but the cinematograhpy is classic film noir at it’s best)
- Gone with the Wind (No image is wasted in this classical epic, the colors are so vivid and beautiful)
My least favorites:
- Slumdog Millionaire (As I said earlier, I really love the film but I think the oscars went too far believing this is another Last Emperor o The English Patient, Changeling and The Dark Knight were way better)
- Pan’s Labyrinth (sorry but the The Prestige and Children of Men was soooo much better, the film is too dark, in images and style)
- Mississippi Burning (overrated)
- Gandhi (the images are too plain, the oscars think because a movie that’s epic and works is supposed to be perfect in every way)
- Reds (Way overrated, the scenes in snow are nice but nothing amazing, I prefer the Excalibur cinematography instead)
- The Towering Inferno (This films looks ugly, what the hell were they thinking?)
- A Man for All Seasons (I looved this film but honestly I never thought this was great cinematography, the camera is just dull)
- My Fair Lady (In those days Hollywood thought that If a musical had great sets and costumes it deserved best cinematography)
- From Here to Eternity (I agree, what did the oscars see in that film?)
- An American in Paris (The camera is just there watching the people dance, and the over the top colors almost make me have seizures)