2

Review: Never Let Me Go (2010)

Never Let Me Go

Rating

Director
Mark Romanek
Screenplay
Alex Garland (Novel: Kazuo Ishiguro)
Length
103 min.
Starring
Carey Mulligan, Andrew Garfield, Keira Knightley, Isobel Meikle-Small, Charlie Rowe, Ella Purnell, Charlotte Rampling, Sally Hawkins
MPAA Rating
R for some sexuality and nudity

Buy on DVD

Buy on Blu-ray

Soundtrack

Poster

Source Material

Review
It's a movie that didn't get nearly the attention this year that it probably should have. Never Let Me Go is a tender story based on Kazuo Ishiguro's celebrated novel about an alternate reality where cures for all known diseases and ailments was discovered through a process of creating human clones for organ harvesting. The story starts in the 1970s as three young clones are being raised in a boarding school where they are educated and prepared for brief lives before being farmed.

Carey Mulligan, Andrew Garfield and Keira Knightley star as those clones Kathy, Tommy and Ruth respectively. They, like the other children, know nothing about their life purposes. They believe themselves to be thinking, breathing organic lives that will grow old together. A conscientious teacher shatters their perceptions and tells them about their future existence. It sets them all on regretful internal journeys to try and come to terms with their fates. While never dealing with the legal implications of the situation, the film focuses entirely on the moral ones. As they learn art and music, they grow and develop just like other children, the difference is that these kids are not likely to live a third of the lifespan of those whose lives they are saving. The film never gives us reason to understand or sympathize with the dying who will receive the generous organs that will keep them going. So, the audience is only left with trying to fathom how we could allow our own civilization to believe that such a measure would be appropriate.

Mulligan, Garfield and Knightley are all superlative. They each convey the jealousy, anger, sadness, hope and despair that go with their various lives. Knightley has shown a level of acting maturity that has been missing from her broader, more audience-friendly work. You might even mistake her for a serious actress if you only had films like this as a reference. Mulligan and Garfield, however, haven't been dragged into the populism as deeply as their contemporary has, though they have both shown a willingness to perform for a paycheck. Of course, they have plenty of role-models doing the same thing, so we cannot expect them to perform any less.

The story is beautifully crafted, sweet, serene and challenging without feeling heavy handed or egomaniacal. The music is a bit overbearing at times, but is no less beautiful. Director Mark Romanek doesn't draw attention to himself and allows his actors to convey every emotional treatise the piece has to offer and it's a stronger film because of it.
Review Written
December 20, 2010

Written by: - () | Filed under: Film Reviews ( Leave a comment )
Comments (2) Trackbacks (0)
  1. It’s a bit harsh to judge actors for being dragged into the “populism” when they too have to work for a living and popular movies are where the money is. Especially considering that you, sir, are a movie critic and not a “serious” writer.

    • There are many different types of writers. And there are plenty of actors who remain within the integrity of the profession and never deign to appear in a blockbuster in an effort to make money. You seem to be under some impression that it requires actors take on blockbusters in order to make a living, but in point of fact, many actors make fantastic livings off small, independent efforts without the necessity to make a money-grubbing film. So yes, I think that fact gives me every right to criticize someone for taking roles in blockbusters for no other reason to make money. Nicolas Cage is the prime example. He has been wasteful with his money and only takes on crap roles because he needs the money to pay for his extravagant and unnecessary lifestyle.

      And for that matter, not all blockbusters have to be devoid of artistic integrity. Take the Lord of the Rings trilogy for example. It is one of the greatest trilogies ever filmed and has proven box office staying power. Blockbusters in general are not bad. But taking on a role with a director who’s known for making crap like Michael Bay or Jerry Bruckheimer and you get what you get. These actors know full well that they aren’t looking for art, but money. There is a problem with greed in the film industry just as much as in any industry.

      Of course, you spend your life trolling the internet to find those who are critical of your favorite stars in an effort to throw out some trite expression about “serious” writers or some other tripe that, upon detailed examination holds no water whatsoever. What you know about film criticism and writing could fill a thimble and leave plenty of room for a stark-naked poodle.


Leave a comment


No trackbacks yet.