Posted

in

by

Tags:


This is a Resurfaced review written in 2002 or earlier. For more information, please visit this link: Resurfaced Reviews.

The Count of Monte Cristo

The Count of Monte Cristo

Rating

Director

Kevin Reynolds

Screenplay

Jay Wolpert (Novel: Alexandre Dumas pรจre)

Length

2h 11m

Starring

Jim Caviezel, Guy Pearce, James Frain, Dagmara Domi?czyk, Luis Guzmรกn, Richard Harris, Michael Wincott, Henry Cavill, Albie Woodington, JB Blanc, Alex Norton, Patrick Godfrey, Freddie Jones, Helen McCrory, Christopher Adamson

MPAA Rating

PG-13

Buy/Rent Movie

Soundtrack

Poster

Source Material

Review

The classic novel of circumstances and revenge, “The Count of Monte Cristo” is revived in a new feature film of the Alexandre Dumas classic.

Jim Caviezel stars as Edmond Dantรจs, a lowly sailor who proves his worth on a sailing voyage and is promoted to first mate ahead of a crusty sea dog. Dantรจs’ friend Fernand Mondego is secretly in love with Dantรจs’ girlfriend Mercรฉdรจs (Dagmara Dominczyk) and plots with the crusty sea dog to set up Dantรจs for treason. The incident that led Dantรจs to the first mate position was a shipwreck that landed him on Elba where he met and carried a secret transmission from exiled dictator Napoleon (Alex Norton).

After spending several years locked away in a hellish prison, Dantรจs meets up with an old inmate named Abbรฉ Faria (Richard Harris) who helps restore Dantรจs’ confidence by teaching him how to read, write and speak for himself.

Upon escaping the prison, Dantรจs goes on a quest as the Count of Monte Cristo to avenge his betrayal and recapture the heart of his destined love. Incident and intrigue follow him throughout the film, allowing for an impressive, if not typical action film.

One of the big problems of adaptation is when directors adapt the same source material on multiple occasions. This outing pits director Kevin Reynolds against a complex script about revenge and its trappings. The script plays well to the moral dilemmas, but Reynolds direction is languid and unimpressive.

The film plays like a high school production of a play based on the book. Much like Jeremy Irons in “Dungeons and Dragons,” Pearce plays way over the top for his uppity, swordsman villain. Luckily Pearce doesn’t explode all over the role like Irons did and keeps himself reserved enough to avoid too much comparison. On the other hand, Caviezel, who came to prominence in Terrence Malick’s war symphony “The Thin Red Line,” manages a difficult part without putting too much venom into his vengeance. He makes the potentially lifeless character more vivid than other actors might.

The acting, overall, is quite paltry. None of the performers, save Caviezel, make their characters anything more than the two-dimensional paper they were written on. Dumas would feel insulted that the characters he breathed life into were no more than charicatures prancing across the screen in a period action film.

The production design gives the film much more power than its performances, acting as a secondary character to the story; however, all of the effects are quite standard to the genre and aren’t overly unique or impressive.

“The Count of Monte Cristo” is a pale attempt at an adaptation that looks and sounds like its source material, but has an undercurrent of imperfection that prevents an audience attracted to such stories from finding any enjoyment in its celluloid pages.

Awards Prospects

Unlikely to figure in any of the prominent Oscar races much like 2001’s “The Musketeer.”

Review Written

April 18, 2002

Verified by MonsterInsights